Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 272 S.W.3d 615
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1566
  • 2008 WL 5234268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that when a two-step interrogation tactic has been used deliberately, a suspect’s unwarned and warned statements must be suppressed
  • holding that when “two-step” interrogation tactic has been used deliberately, suspect’s unwarned and warned statements must be suppressed
  • holding that when “two-step” interrogation tactic has been used deliberately, suspect’s unwarned and warned statements must be suppressed
  • observing that appropriate curative measure is substantial break in time and circumstances between unwarned statement and Miranda warning
  • observing that appropriate curative measure is substantial break in time and circumstances between unwarned statement and Miranda warning
  • observing that appropriate curative measure is substantial break in time and circumstances between unwarned statement and Miranda warning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Price, Womack, Holcomb, Cochran, Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

68 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.