Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/21/1995

Wilkerson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.

Citations

659 N.E.2d 979
213 Ill. Dec. 633
276 Ill. App. 3d 1023

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

allowing a nonparty coworker’s deposition from a prior trial, but it is not clear from the opinion whether the deposition was classified as discovery or evidentiary
“Requiring a party to call all previously disclosed expert witnesses would unnecessarily prolong the trial and unnecessarily increase expenses.”
allowing a nonparty coworker's deposition from a prior trial, but it is not clear from the opinion whether the deposition was classified as discovery or evidentiary
“Before giving the instruction, the trial court must first determine whether, in all likelihood, the party would have produced the witness under the facts and circumstances of the case unless the testimony would be unfavorable.”
“Before giving the instruction, the trial court must first determine whether, in all likelihood, the party would have produced the witness under the facts and circumstances of the case unless the testimony would be unfavorable.”
depositions of deceased employees properly excluded

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steigmann, McCullough

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.