· 9/29/1994
Taylor v. Kohli
Citations
- 642 N.E.2d 467
- 162 Ill. 2d 91
- 204 Ill. Dec. 766
- 1994 Ill. LEXIS 128
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that trial court erred in tendering missing-witness instruction to jury where the plaintiff advised the defendant of his decision to abandon expert witness 19 months prior to trial
- holding that trial court erred in tendering missing-witness instruction to jury where the plaintiff advised the defendant of his decision to abandon expert witness 19 months prior to trial
- expert witness is not per se agent of person who hired them, and expert’s discovery deposition testimony is not admissible as statement against interest
- the principal factor to consider in determining whether a relationship is that of principal/agent, employer/employee or owner/independent contractor is the right to control the manner in which the work is done
- the principal factor to consider in determining whether a relationship is that of principal/ agent, employer/employee or owner/independent contractor is the right to control the manner in which the work is done
- the principal factor to consider in determining whether a relationship is that of principal/ agent, employer/employee or owner/independent contractor is the right to control the manner in which the work is done
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Heiple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.