Johnson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Where a witness who has knowledge of the facts and is accessible to a party is not called by a party, a presumption arises that his testimony would be adverse to that party”
• “As long as the order is directed at the corporate defendant rather than the individual employees and directors, principles of due process are not violated, and a court may sanction a corporate defendant for its failure to produce its employees.”
• “As long as the order is directed at the corporate defendant rather than the individual employees and directors, principles of due process are not violated, and a court may sanction a corporate defendant for its failure to produce its employees.”
• “As long as the order is directed at the corporate defendant rather than the individual employees and 20 1-18-2019 directors, principles of due process are not violated, and a court may sanction a corporate defendant for its failure to produce its employees.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).