Appellate Court of Illinois· 12/14/2001
Nasrallah v. Davilla
Citations
- 762 N.E.2d 25
- 326 Ill. App. 3d 1036
- 260 Ill. Dec. 759
- 2001 Ill. App. LEXIS 930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that rulings are substantial when \any question of evidence to be admitted\ is considered
- finding adverse inference charge to be appropriate remedy when defendant refused to testify even though subpoenaed by plaintiff
- the trier of fact may draw negative inferences against a party that refuses to testify
- the trier of fact may draw negative inferences against a party that refuses to testify
- a prior ruling setting the evidence deposition fee was not substantial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Gonzalez v. Safe & Sound Security Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-09-19· cited 64×
- In Re Estate of GayAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-10-22· cited 30×
- Anest v. AudinoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-07-12· cited 27×
- Lawler v. MacDuffAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-10-25· cited 20×
- In re Marriage of CrecosAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-09-24· cited 16×
- Partipilo v. PartipiloAppellate Court of Illinois· 2002-05-17· cited 15×
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2022-04-25· cited 14×
- American Country Insurance v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-13· cited 12×
- Powell v. Dean Foods CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-09-10· cited 9×
- J.M. v. BresenoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-03· cited 7×
- Palos Community Hospital v. Humana, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-04-17· cited 6×
- Kalmin v. VaranAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-11-01· cited 5×
- JM v. BrisenoAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-03· cited 4×
- Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound SEC. Corp.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2004-04-06· cited 3×
- In re Estate of Gay Opinion corrected 11/24/04Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-10-22
- American Country Insurance Co. v. Williams Modified Upon Rehearing - replaces Opinion filed 1/24/03Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-06-13
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court· 1976-04-20· cited 2,133×
- Lucas v. LakinIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-01-30· cited 173×
- Buehler v. WhalenIllinois Supreme Court· 1978-03-14· cited 160×
- Herzog v. Lexington TownshipIllinois Supreme Court· 1995-10-19· cited 159×
- Schwartz v. CortelloniIllinois Supreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 139×
- People v. Dominique F.Illinois Supreme Court· 1991-11-27· cited 66×
- In Re Marriage of PetersenAppellate Court of Illinois· 2001-02-01· cited 62×
- Bonnie Owen Realty, Inc. v. Cincinnati InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois· 1996-09-24· cited 50×
- Taylor v. KohliIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 49×
- Snow v. DixonIllinois Supreme Court· 1977-04-05· cited 47×
- In Re Marriage of AbmaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-11-01· cited 39×
- Rodisch v. Commacho-EsparzaAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-12-23· cited 37×
- Simmons v. University of Chicago Hospitals & ClinicsIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-22· cited 34×
- West Bend Mutual Insurance v. HerreraAppellate Court of Illinois· 1997-09-30· cited 30×
- Wilkerson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-21· cited 26×
- Perkins v. HarrisAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-11-18· cited 22×
- Sahoury v. MosesAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-10-22· cited 19×
- Bianchi v. MikhailAppellate Court of Illinois· 1994-10-03· cited 19×
- Frede v. McDanielsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1976-04-14· cited 18×
- Haynes v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-05-20· cited 17×
Other cases named Nasrallah v. Davilla
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.