Skip to main content
· 9/21/1992

Thacker v. U N R Industries, Inc.

Citations

  • 603 N.E.2d 449
  • 151 Ill. 2d 343
  • 177 Ill. Dec. 379
  • 61 U.S.L.W. 2236
  • 1992 Ill. LEXIS 113

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to address the appellant’s claim as “the defendant failed completely to articulate its position in its post-trial motion”
  • finding nexus between felony of filing false return and public service after concluding that improper payments in exchange for using status as alderman was substantial factor in conviction
  • noting, for example, that “a plaintiff injured by asbestos fibers often does not know exactly when or where he was injured and therefore is unable to describe the details of how such injury occurred”
  • finding nexus between felony of filing false return and public service after 8 No. 1-07-2950 concluding that improper payments in exchange for using status as alderman was substantial factor in conviction
  • decedent was in sufficient proximity to asbestos due to fiber drift even though product was processed in different part of plant
  • decedent was in sufficient proximity to asbestos due to fiber drift even though product was processed in different part of plant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.