Skip to main content

Patterson v. State

Citations

  • 958 N.E.2d 478
  • 2011 Ind. App. LEXIS 1902
  • 2011 WL 5965819

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant’s argument that search and seizure violated Article 1, Section 11 of the Indiana Constitution was waived where he presented no authority or independent analysis supporting a separate standard under the Indiana Constitution
  • finding presence in a high-crime area to be a relevant factor in determining whether officer had a reasonable belief that the defendant was armed so as to justify a pat-down search
  • Terry frisk was justified during a traffic stop in a high crime area where officer detected odor of marijuana
  • assertion of a violation of article 1 section 11 not accompanied by “independent analysis supporting a separate standard under the Indiana Constitution” results in a waiver of any state constitutional claim
  • “In determining whether an officer acted reasonably under the circumstances, we consider the specific, reasonable inferences that the officer is entitled to draw from the facts in light of his or her experience.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mathias, Bailey, Crone

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.