Federal Claims· 8/1/2005
White & Case LLP v. United States
Citations
- 67 Fed. Cl. 164
- 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1747
- 2005 U.S. Claims LEXIS 234
- 2005 WL 1839173
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- questioning whether deference to an agency’s interpretation of a money-mandating statute is appropriate
- exhaustion not required where no time frame specified under customs statute
- explaining difference between prudential and Article III ripeness
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerOther cases named White & Case LLP v. United States
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.