Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 8/1/2005

White & Case LLP v. United States

Citations

  • 67 Fed. Cl. 164
  • 28 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1747
  • 2005 U.S. Claims LEXIS 234
  • 2005 WL 1839173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • questioning whether deference to an agency’s interpretation of a money-mandating statute is appropriate
  • exhaustion not required where no time frame specified under customs statute
  • explaining difference between prudential and Article III ripeness

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Other cases named White & Case LLP v. United States

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.