Supreme Court· 1/31/1938

Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

Citations

303 U.S. 41
58 S. Ct. 459
82 L. Ed. 638
1938 U.S. LEXIS 361

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that a federal lawsuit may not be used to pre-empt administrative action
noting “the long settled rule of judicial administration that no one is entitled to judicial relief for a supposed or threatened injury until the prescribed administrative remedy has been exhausted”
rule requiring exhaustion of the administrative remedy cannot be circumvented by asserting that the holding of the prescribed administrative hearing would result in irreparable damage
“Obviously, the rule requiring exhaustion of the administrative remedy cannot be circumvented by asserting . . . that the mere holding of the prescribed administrative hearing would result in irreparable damage.”
describing exhaustion as a “rule of judicial administration”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brandeis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,330 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.