Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra Club

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that some claims regarding a Forest Plan under NFMA are not ripe unless they challenge site-specific actions
• holding that a procedural dispute is ripe “at the time the [procedural] failure takes place”
• holding that some claims regarding a Forest Plan under NFMA are not ripe unless they challenge site-specific actions
• concluding that immediate judicial review would interfere with administrative efforts to refine logging policies because the agency's regulations called for administrative approval of site-specific proposals
• deciding case on ripeness grounds even though petitioner argued the case was nonjusticiable on both standing and ripeness grounds
• holding that requiring a party to participate in further administrative or judicial proceedings is not a hardship sufficient to outweigh 98 a determination that an issue is unfit for review

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).