Federal Claims· 8/10/2007
Bailey v. United States
Citations
- 78 Fed. Cl. 239
- 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 261
- 2007 WL 2317493
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- rejecting Government’s argument that a challenged restoration order “is not the type of decision which may be considered ripe for takings claim purposes”
- a regulatory takings ease in which the court undertakes an in-depth discussion of ease law applied to takings by physical possession
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wolski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Resource Investments, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-01-23· cited 60×
- Stanwyck v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2016-07-05· cited 45×
- Forest Glen Properties, LLC v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2007-12-20· cited 15×
- L-3 Communications Integrated Systems v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2008-11-25· cited 14×
- Banks v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2009-08-11· cited 11×
- Mehaffy v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2011-04-29· cited 3×
- Lucree v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-07-31· cited 2×
- Bailey v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2014-05-29
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2019-12-13
- Fairholme Funds, Inc. v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2020-03-09
- Bailey v. United StatesFederal Claims· 2021-07-30
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict of Columbia· 2022-09-01
Cites
142 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 119,442×
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court· 1974-04-17· cited 13,385×
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court· 1978-10-02· cited 3,324×
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 2,607×
- Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1972-06-26· cited 2,510×
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court· 1992-06-29· cited 2,333×
- Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court· 1821-03-18· cited 2,076×
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court· 1922-12-11· cited 1,990×
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceFederal Circuit· 1988-05-16· cited 1,960×
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court· 1987-06-26· cited 1,301×
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court· 1980-06-10· cited 1,272×
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court· 1987-06-09· cited 1,264×
- Lingle v. Chevron U. S. A. Inc.Supreme Court· 2005-05-23· cited 1,235×
- Armstrong v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-06-27· cited 1,118×
- United States v. CausbySupreme Court· 1946-05-27· cited 1,036×
- Yee v. City of EscondidoSupreme Court· 1992-04-01· cited 953×
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1979-12-04· cited 940×
- Tahoe-Sierra Preservation Council, Inc. v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court· 2002-04-23· cited 862×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.