Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 8/10/2007

Bailey v. United States

Citations

  • 78 Fed. Cl. 239
  • 2007 U.S. Claims LEXIS 261
  • 2007 WL 2317493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting Government’s argument that a challenged restoration order “is not the type of decision which may be considered ripe for takings claim purposes”
  • a regulatory takings ease in which the court undertakes an in-depth discussion of ease law applied to takings by physical possession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wolski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

142 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.