Indiana Court of Appeals· 2/7/2006

Whaley v. State

Citations

843 N.E.2d 1
2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 164
2006 WL 279071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that two convictions for resisting law enforcement did not violate double jeopardy even though defendant’s actions involved a single incident of resisting because defendant injured two people as a result of his resistance
holding that the evidence was sufficient to sustain the defendant’s convictions for two counts of resisting law enforcement as class D felonies where the defendant argued that the officers inflicted the injuries upon themselves in attempting to handcuff him
“Failure to put forth a cogent argument acts as a waiver of the issue on appeal.”
“Failure to put forth a cogent argument acts as a waiver of the issue on appeal.”
“Failure to put forth a cogent argument acts as a waiver of the issue on appeal.”
two convictions for resisting law enforcement did not violate double jeopardy even though defendant’s actions involved a single incident of resisting because defendant injured two people as a result of his resistance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sharpnack, Darden, Bailey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.