Maurice Frazier v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that no double jeopardy violation existed under either the continuous crime doctrine or the actual evidence test where offenses charged involved different victims
• concluding that no double jeopardy violation existed under either the continuous crime doctrine or the actual evidence test where offenses charged involved different victims
• holding evidence Frazier grabbed victim’s hand and placed it on his crotch was sufficient to demonstrate forceful compulsion
• finding no double jeopardy violation under either the actual evidence test or the continuing crime doctrine where different victims were involved
• addressing the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction for sexual battery as a Class D felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).