Skip to main content

Pickens v. State

Citations

  • 767 N.E.2d 530
  • 2002 Ind. LEXIS 370
  • 2002 WL 977171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court's consideration of this factor was incorrect where there was nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court was considering less than the presumptive sentence
  • holding that the trial court's consideration of this factor was incorrect where there was nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court was considering less than the presumptive sentence
  • holding that the trial court's consideration of this factor was incorrect where there was nothing in the record to indicate that the trial court was considering less than the presumptive sentence
  • holding that even when a trial court improperly applies an aggravator, a sentence enhancement may be upheld if other valid aggravators exist
  • holding that trial court’s finding as to remorse or lack thereof is “similar to a determination of credibility.”
  • holding that “a sentence enhancement may be upheld if other valid aggravators exist”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dickson, Shepard, Sullivan, Boehm, Rucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.