Wertz v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that CERCLA claims could not be brought against dissolved Washington corporation after expiration of Washington’s two-year corporate capacity term
• finding that CERCLA’s § 9613(g) did not preempt Washington statute which prescribed time within which a dissolved corporation retained its capacity to be sued
• holding Rule 15 did not apply were the plaintiffs “knew who those parties were and made a mistake in who it ought to sue under the circumstances”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).