Skip to main content
Federal Claims· 3/14/2005

Hamzik v. United States

Citations

  • 64 Fed. Cl. 766
  • 95 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1416
  • 2005 U.S. Claims LEXIS 66
  • 2005 WL 591169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiffs tax return, which was replete with zeros, could not form the basis of a refund claim
  • filing a zero position return was insufficient to support a refund suit
  • “A broad constellation of cases has held that a return which lacks essential financial information and, in particular, contains no recitation of taxpayer’s income, is not a properly executed return for purposes of the tax laws.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allegra

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.