Dipankar Mukherjee, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that there was no affirmative misconduct where the consular officer failed to inform petitioner that his visa was approved and misinformed petitioner that he was not subject to a two-year residency requirement
• finding no affirmative misconduct on 9 government’s behalf despite vice consul’s incorrect advice to petitioner
• no equitable estoppel based on misinformation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).