Wentland v. Wass

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• refraining from applying the litigation privilege where doing so would “not encourage finality [or] avoid litigation”
• “[Wjhether the litigation privilege applies to an action for breach of contract turns on whether its application furthers the policies underlying the privilege”
• “Just as one who validly contracts not to speak waives the protection of the anti-SLAPP statute, so too has he waived the protection of the litigation privilege.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).