· 11/18/2010
Rain v. Rolls-Royce Corp.
Citations
- 626 F.3d 372
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 23713
- 2010 WL 4643038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- predicting Indiana would apply the privilege to voluntary statements in a RICO complaint, despite non-disparagement provision in contract
- affirming district court's use of Black's Law Dictionary to define \disparage\ as contract term
- “[T]he question [is] whether applying the litigation privilege in this case would promote the due administration of justice and free expression by participants in judicial proceedings.”
- “The non-disparagement clause is clear and unambiguous, providing simply that ‘[n]one of the Parties will disparage the other.’”
- listing cases from several jurisdictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bauer, Flaum, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.