California Court of Appeal· 12/1/2010
Olsen v. Harbison
Citations
- 191 Cal. App. 4th 325
- 119 Cal. Rptr. 3d 460
- 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 2161
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It immunizes defendants from virtually any 20 tort liability . . . with the sole exception of causes of action for malicious prosecution.”
- “The breadth of the litigation privilege cannot be understated. It immunizes defendants from virtually any tort liability [including claims for fraud], with the sole exception of causes of action for malicious prosecution.”
- “Had there been no litigation, these comments 5 would never have been made.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hull
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- City of Costa Mesa v. D'Alessio InvestmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-03-11· cited 75×
- Finton Construction, Inc. v. Bidna & Keys, APLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-06-29· cited 68×
- Graham-Sult v. ClainosNinth Circuit· 2013-12-27· cited 64×
- Fair v. BakhtiariCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-05-24· cited 61×
- Crossroads Investors, L.P. v. Fed. Nat'l Mortg. Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-07-26· cited 61×
- Greco v. GrecoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-08-23· cited 31×
- Kettler v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2018-04-20· cited 11×
- Brault Graham, LLC v. Law Offices of Peter G. Angelos, P.CCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-05-03· cited 9×
- Alexander Graham-Sult v. Nicholas ClainosNinth Circuit· 2013-12-27· cited 8×
- Popovich v. WeingartenN.D. Indiana· 2011-03-14· cited 3×
- Hart v. LarsonS.D. California· 2017-02-07· cited 3×
- Simms v. SeamanConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-06-28· cited 3×
- Alexander Graham-Sult v. Nicholas ClainosNinth Circuit· 2014-02-05
- Crossroads Investors v. Federal National Mortgage Assn.California Court of Appeal· 2017-07-26
- Kettler v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2018-04-20
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1962-03-22· cited 2,916×
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-02-26· cited 660×
- Crowley v. KatlemanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-31· cited 386×
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court· 2007-08-02· cited 314×
- LiMandri v. JudkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-01-28· cited 302×
- Fracasse v. BrentCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-03-10· cited 260×
- Edwards v. Centex Real Estate Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1997-02-27· cited 175×
- Rothman v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-10-01· cited 88×
- Huskinson & Brown, Limited Liability Partnership v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court· 2004-02-23· cited 80×
- Frazier, Dame, Doherty, Parrish & Hanawalt v. Boccardo, Blum, Lull, Niland, Teerlink & BellCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1977-06-02· cited 59×
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal· 1992-04-09· cited 44×
- Wentland v. WassCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-02-22· cited 38×
- Keefe v. KompaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-10-12· cited 30×
- Saunders v. Weissburg & AronsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-09-08· cited 20×
- Cohen v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-04-24· cited 18×
- Strong v. BeydounCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-09-19· cited 10×
- Levin v. Gulf Insurance GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-02-16· cited 10×
- Scalzo v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-04-28· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.