California Court of Appeal· 5/24/1988
Maheu v. CBS, INC.
Citations
- 201 Cal. App. 3d 662
- 247 Cal. Rptr. 304
- 7 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1238
- 15 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1548
- 1988 Cal. App. LEXIS 477
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In an action based on civil conspiracy, the 9 applicable statute of limitations is determined by the nature of the action in which the 10 conspiracy is alleged.” (citing Bedolla v. Logan & Frazer, 125 Cal. Rptr. 59 (Ct. App. 11 1975))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: George
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Careau & Co. v. Security Pacific Business Credit, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1990-08-17· cited 465×
- Fremont Indemnity Co. v. Fremont General Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2007-02-28· cited 194×
- Kidron v. Movie Acquisition Corp.California Court of Appeal· 1995-12-13· cited 142×
- Sipple v. Foundation for National ProgressCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-04-07· cited 121×
- Stewart v. Rolling Stone LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-01-28· cited 82×
- Fuller v. First Franklin Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2013-05-29· cited 61×
- Gionfriddo v. Major League BaseballCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-12-10· cited 48×
- Stansfield v. StarkeyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-05-09· cited 46×
- Dora v. Frontline Video, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1993-04-30· cited 44×
- Balboa Insurance v. Trans Global EquitiesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-21· cited 42×
- Wentland v. WassCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-02-22· cited 38×
- Baugh v. CBS, INC.N.D. California· 1993-06-22· cited 32×
- Vanna White v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. David Deutsch AssociatesNinth Circuit· 1993-03-18· cited 27×
- Silver v. GoldCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-05-31· cited 27×
- Intermedics, Inc. v. Ventritex, Inc.N.D. California· 1993-04-30· cited 25×
- Hae Won Lee v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-13· cited 24×
- Symonds v. Mercury Savings and Loan Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-12-04· cited 16×
- Albarran v. New Form, Inc. (In Re Albarran)Ninth Circuit· 2006-07-24· cited 12×
- Shanahan v. State Farm General InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-03-08· cited 10×
- Unnamed caseNinth Circuit· 1992-07-24· cited 6×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1985-08-01· cited 1,989×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSupreme Court· 1985-05-20· cited 1,191×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 268×
- Wyatt v. Union Mortgage Co.California Supreme Court· 1979-08-10· cited 244×
- Reader's Digest Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1984-11-19· cited 209×
- People v. ZamoraCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-16· cited 204×
- Rosemont Enterprises, Inc. v. Random House, Inc. And John KeatsSecond Circuit· 1966-08-17· cited 179×
- Frank Oddo v. Jack W. Ries, Mme Publications, Mme Publishing Company and Material Movement EnterprisesNinth Circuit· 1984-06-19· cited 134×
- Kapellas v. KofmanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-24· cited 130×
- Bennett v. Hibernia BankCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-12-27· cited 126×
- Forsher v. BugliosiCalifornia Supreme Court· 1980-04-10· cited 101×
- Eastwood v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1983-12-01· cited 98×
- Robert A. Maheu, and v. Hughes Tool Company, a Corporation, Now Known as Summa Corporation, Defendant-Counterclaimant-Appellant AndNinth Circuit· 1978-01-12· cited 97×
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesSecond Circuit· 1983-11-17· cited 90×
- Bedolla v. Logan & FrazerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1975-10-15· cited 88×
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 67×
- Andrew F. Ehat v. Jerald Tanner and Sandra Tanner, Dba Modern Microfilm CompanyTenth Circuit· 1985-12-30· cited 59×
- Institute of Veterinary Pathology, Inc. v. California Health Laboratories, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1981-02-23· cited 43×
- Schessler v. KeckCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1954-06-11· cited 41×
- Johnson v. Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1974-12-13· cited 40×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.