District of Columbia· 2/6/2012
Weng v. Solis
Citations
- 842 F. Supp. 2d 147
- 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13870
- 2012 WL 366735
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Retaliation in response to request for accommodation of a disability can be basis for liability under Rehabilitation Act
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-11-09· cited 8,430×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchD.C. Circuit· 1997-07-18· cited 1,499×
- Douglas v. DonovanD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 361×
- Lipsky v. Commonwealth United Corp.Second Circuit· 1976-12-01· cited 322×
- In Re United Mine Workers of America Employee Benefit Plans LitigationDistrict of Columbia· 1994-06-07· cited 261×
- Smith v. District of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2005-12-06· cited 207×
- Michael D. Bayer v. United States Department of the TreasuryD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-21· cited 184×
- Stabilisierungsfonds Fur Wein v. Kaiser Stuhl Wine Distributors Pty. Ltd.D.C. Circuit· 1981-03-23· cited 177×
- Mogenhan v. NapolitanoD.C. Circuit· 2010-07-27· cited 144×
- Coleman-Adebayo v. LeavittDistrict of Columbia· 2004-07-26· cited 89×
- Williams v. ChuDistrict of Columbia· 2009-08-13· cited 48×
- Halcomb v. Office of the Senate Sergeant-At-ArmsDistrict of Columbia· 2008-07-02· cited 32×
- Pigford v. VenemanDistrict of Columbia· 2003-04-14· cited 32×
- Noisette v. GEITHNERDistrict of Columbia· 2010-03-12· cited 17×
- Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve SystemDistrict of Columbia· 2009-11-19· cited 17×
- Association of American Medical Colleges v. Princeton Review, Inc.District of Columbia· 2004-06-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.