Skip to main content
· 2/21/1992

Michael D. Bayer v. United States Department of the Treasury

Citations

  • 956 F.2d 330
  • 294 U.S. App. D.C. 44
  • 21 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1339
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 2167
  • 58 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,290
  • 58 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 162
  • 1992 WL 30006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the plaintiff “bears the burden of pleading and proving ... ‘equitable reasons’ for noncompliance”
  • noting that the plaintiff “bears the burden of pleading and proving . . . ‘equitable reasons’ for noncompliance”
  • stating that the plaintiff bears the burden of pleading that the court should exercise its equitable power to toll a limitations period
  • referring to then-applicable thirty-day time limit for contacting an EEO counselor
  • allowing equitable tolling where Plaintiff stated “[i]n his affidavit . . . that he was not ever aware or ever notified of the requirement that the EEO Counselor had to be notified within 30 days of a discriminatory act” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikva, Ginsburg, Randolph

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.