Skip to main content
· 8/13/2009

Williams v. Chu

Citations

  • 641 F. Supp. 2d 31
  • 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71412
  • 2009 WL 2475168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the court could take judicial notice of EEOC decision denying plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of her discrimination complaints
  • deciding statute of limitations issue based on document attached to complaint and subject to judicial notice
  • deciding statute of limitations issue based on document attached to complaint and subject to judicial notice
  • relying on date EEOC denied appeal and date the plaintiff received notice of denial to decide on merits
  • considering facts in the EEOC’s written decision, which the plaintiff attached to the complaint
  • “A plaintiff’s EEOC charge and the agency’s determination are both public records, of which this Court may take judicial notice.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Reggie B. Walton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.