Weng v. Solis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the plaintiff's removal from a flexible work program caused a significant change in benefits
• holding that neither a “Warning Memorandum” nor a “Letter of Reprimand” constituted adverse employment actions in the absence of effect on “grade, salary, benefits” or other “terms, conditions, or privileges of . . . employment or future employment opportunities”
• holding that offensive statements are not adverse employment action
• explaining that “micromanagement and nitpicking” are not materially adverse

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).