Sirois v. E. W. Partners, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the proponent of an expert report failed the first factor where it \could have sought\ the report prior to filing a motion
• finding that “when the subjective elements of willfulness, intent or good faith” are at issue, a conclusion that there is “no genuine issue of material fact will ordinarily be very difficult to sustain”
• denying motion to supplement the record on appeal with documents unlikely to have affected the outcome of summary judgment in the trial court
• noting \[t]he inquiry is 'whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law'\ (quoting Brill v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 142 N.J. 520, 536 (1995))
• \Our appellate courts will not ordinarily consider evidentiary material that is not in the record below.\ (citation omitted)
• \Our appellate courts will not ordinarily consider evidentiary material that is not in the record below.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).