Skip to main content

Wells v. State

Citations

  • 836 N.E.2d 475
  • 2005 Ind. App. LEXIS 2034
  • 2005 WL 2840289

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a guilty plea “does not rise to the level of significant mitigation where the defendant has received a substantial benefit from the plea”
  • holding that a guilty plea does not rise to the level of significant mitigation where the evidence against the defendant is such that the decision to plead guilty is merely a pragmatic one
  • holding that decision to plead is not entitled to substantial mitigating weight if the evidence against the defendant is such that his decision to plead guilty is a pragmatic one
  • holding that there was no abuse of discretion where the trial court did not accord mitigating weight to the defendant's guilty plea where the defendant's decision to plead guilty was pragmatic
  • holding the trial court is not required to give significant mitigating weight to a defendant’s guilty plea if it is pragmatic
  • stating that “a guilty plea does not rise to the level of significant mitigation . . . where the evidence against him is such that the decision to plead guilty is merely a pragmatic one”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker, Mathias, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.