Skip to main content

Simms v. State

Citations

  • 791 N.E.2d 225
  • 2003 Ind. App. LEXIS 1213
  • 2003 WL 21540390

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was precluded from raising a mitigating circumstance on appeal when he had failed to advance it as a mitigating circumstance at sentencing
  • holding that, when defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, he is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal
  • explaining that “[i]f the defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, this court will presume that the circumstance is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
  • explaining that “[i]f the defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, this court will presume that the circumstance is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
  • explaining that “[i]f the defendant fails to advance a mitigating circumstance at sentencing, this court will presume that the circumstance is not significant and the defendant is precluded from advancing it as a mitigating circumstance for the first time on appeal.”
  • finding Simms’ vague Fifth Amendment double jeopardy claim waived for failure to make a cogent argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Sharpnack, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.