Skip to main content

Hines v. State

Citations

  • 856 N.E.2d 1275
  • 2006 Ind. App. LEXIS 2378
  • 2006 WL 3361375

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial court had discretion to prohibit defendant from residing within one mile of the victim given the statutory authority to prohibit direct or indirect contact with an individual
  • finding that the defendant was in a position of trust with the victim, who was spending the night with the defendant’s daughter at the time of the molestation
  • finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court’s rejected the defendant’s childhood history mitigator
  • finding no abuse of discretion where the trial court considered the defendant’s position of trust with the victim to be an aggravating circumstance
  • consideration of position of trust aggravator was appropriate where child molest victim was spending the night with defendant’s daughter at defendant’s residence
  • trial court properly cited defendant’s abuse of a position of trust as an aggravating factor; defendant molested victim while she was staying overnight at his house

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Kirsch, Darden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.