Skip to main content

Lindsey v. State

Citations

  • 877 N.E.2d 190
  • 2007 Ind. App. LEXIS 2725
  • 2007 WL 4226076

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that exclusion of evidence was not an appropriate remedy for the State’s discovery violation
  • holding that the exclusion of evidence was not an appropriate remedy for the State’s discovery violation
  • holding that where the prosecution did not deliberately withhold evidence that the defendant, through the exercise of due diligence, could have discovered, the defendant could not show that he was prejudiced by its admission
  • noting that exclusion of evidence is available as a sanction for State’s noncompliance with discovery order
  • failure to request continuance where continuance is the appropriate remedy constitutes waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Friedlander, Sharpnack, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.