Powell v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \The basis for the gross impact that consecutive sentences may have is the moral principle that each separate and distinct criminal act deserves a separately experienced punishment\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edrington v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2009-07-23· cited 41×
• Baugh v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2010-05-05· cited 5×
• State Ex Rel. Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. v. Sullivan Circuit Court
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-12-20· cited 5×
• Brandon S. Spalding v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2016-04-21
• Brian C. Banks v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-21
• Jose Luis Aguilar-Robles v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2017-07-27
• Diego A. Pacheco-Manzo v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2018-09-25
• Alexander Isaiah Garcia-Johnson v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-02-05
• Jay Paul Crouse, Jr. v. State of Indiana
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2020-10-08
• State of Iowa v. Justin Deal
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2021-02-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anglemyer v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 2007-06-26· cited 1,831×
• Sensback v. State
  Indiana Supreme Court· 1999-12-17· cited 112×
• Wells v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-10-31· cited 81×
• Hart v. State
  Indiana Court of Appeals· 2005-06-07· cited 22×