Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 12/15/2017
Weinar, M. v. Lex, W.
Citations
- 176 A.3d 907
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A trial court order confirming a common law arbitration award will be reversed only for an abuse of discretion or an error of law.”
- “A trial court order confirming a common law arbitration award will be reversed only for an abuse of discretion or an error of law.”
- dismissal based upon statute of limitations is not a dismissal on the merits for purposes of applying res judicata
- “[R]es judicata and collateral estoppel are affirmative defenses that must be raised in New Matter, not in preliminary objections . . . unless the complaint sets forth in detail, either directly or by reference, the facts and issues pleaded by the prior suit.”
- “[R]es judicata and collateral estoppel are affirmative defenses that must be raised in New Matter, not in preliminary objections . . . unless the complaint sets forth in detail, either directly or by reference, the facts and issues pleaded by the prior suit.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dubow, Solano, Elliott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Wilmington Trust v. Brolley, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-19· cited 25×
- K.D. v. E.D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-11-16· cited 21×
- Del Ciotto v. Pennsylvania Hospital of the University of Penn Health SystemSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2017-12-27· cited 12×
- Vacula, J. v. Chapman, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-03-05· cited 9×
- U.S. Bank v. Davis, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2020-05-20· cited 7×
- Cooper, S. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2018-12-27
- Roccograndi, E. v. Martin, T.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-07-01
- Principal Securities, Inc. v. Mark A. GelbmanSupreme Court of Iowa· 2025-01-31
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court· 1938-04-25· cited 18,491×
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court· 1983-02-23· cited 9,657×
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court· 1979-01-09· cited 4,229×
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court· 1989-03-06· cited 2,861×
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 2,844×
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,684×
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court· 2008-03-25· cited 1,661×
- Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court· 2009-03-04· cited 1,294×
- Semtek International Inc. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,165×
- Preston v. FerrerSupreme Court· 2008-02-20· cited 504×
- Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-12-15· cited 356×
- Commonwealth v. KaretnySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-08-15· cited 162×
- Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.Third Circuit· 2012-03-14· cited 133×
- Frank Derwin v. General Dynamics CorporationFirst Circuit· 1983-09-30· cited 110×
- Taylor v. Extendicare Health Facilities, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-09-28· cited 98×
- In Re the Nomination Petitions & Papers of StevensonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2012-03-26· cited 95×
- Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corporation and Steven HylenSecond Circuit· 2003-07-14· cited 91×
- Mariner Chestnut Partners, L.P. Ex Rel. Lamm v. LenfestSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 2016-12-07· cited 86×
- Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2008-05-05· cited 76×
- Dooner v. DiDonatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-06-04· cited 74×
Other cases named Weinar, M. v. Lex, W.
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.