Skip to main content
· 5/5/2008

Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.

Citations

  • 948 A.2d 828
  • 2008 Pa. Super. 95
  • 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 989
  • 2008 WL 1932275

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding bank acting pursuant to preexisting loan agreement precluded finding that bank’s actions were unjust
  • affirming grant of summary judgment dismissing unjust enrichment claim on grounds “that as a matter of law, [Appellant] failed to show that [Appellee’s actions were] unjust.”
  • “The elements of unjust enrichment are benefits conferred on defendant by plaintiff . . . .
  • “A quasi-contract imposes duty, not as a result of any agreement, whether express or implied, but in spite of the absence of an agreement, when one party receives unjust enrichment at the expense of another[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bender

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.