· 5/5/2008
Stoeckinger v. Presidential Financial Corp.
Citations
- 948 A.2d 828
- 2008 Pa. Super. 95
- 2008 Pa. Super. LEXIS 989
- 2008 WL 1932275
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding bank acting pursuant to preexisting loan agreement precluded finding that bank’s actions were unjust
- affirming grant of summary judgment dismissing unjust enrichment claim on grounds “that as a matter of law, [Appellant] failed to show that [Appellee’s actions were] unjust.”
- “The elements of unjust enrichment are benefits conferred on defendant by plaintiff . . . .
- “A quasi-contract imposes duty, not as a result of any agreement, whether express or implied, but in spite of the absence of an agreement, when one party receives unjust enrichment at the expense of another[.]”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bender
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.