Skip to main content
· 7/14/2003

Photopaint Technologies, LLC v. Smartlens Corporation and Steven Hylen

Citations

  • 335 F.3d 152
  • 3 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 743
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 14071
  • 2003 WL 21649196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that section 9 of the FAA permits courts to review arbitration awards within one year of the rendering of the award
  • holding that “a party to an arbitration is entitled to the benefits of the streamlined summary proceeding” to confirm if “it files at any time within one year after the award is made”
  • holding that “a party to an arbitration is entitled to the benefits of the streamlined summary proceeding” to confirm if “it files at any time within one year after the award is made”
  • holding that “a party to an arbitration is entitled to the benefits of the streamlined summary proceeding” to confirm if “it files at any time within one year after the award is made”
  • holding that “a party to an arbitration is entitled to the benefits of the streamlined summary proceeding” to confirm if “it files at any time within one year after the award is made”
  • holding that “a party to an arbitration is entitled to the benefits of the streamlined summary proceeding” to confirm if “it files at any time within one year after the award is made”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobs, Calabresi, Sotomayor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.