Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 6/4/2009
Dooner v. DiDonato
Citations
- 971 A.2d 1187
- 601 Pa. 209
- 2009 Pa. LEXIS 1094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “concepts of federalism and state sovereignty make clear that in discerning whether Congress intended to preempt state law, there is a presumption against preemption”
- recognizing a state law tort claim for negligence arising under a duty to provide a safe work environment
- explaining that tort laws “necessarily perform an important remedial role in compensating victims of torts,” albeit in the context of a common law tort (emphasis added)
- explaining that tort laws “necessarily perform an important remedial role in compensating victims of torts,” albeit in the context of a common law tort (emphasis added)
- observing that savings clause in Securities Exchange Act argues against field preemption
- stating, “an exchange’s disciplinary rules deal principally with the just and equitable principles of trading”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Castille, Saylor, Eakin, Baer, Todd, McCaffery, Greenspan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.