Quilloin v. Tenet HealthSystem Philadelphia, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that respondent did not file a motion for summary judgment in response to a motion to compel arbitration
• stating that “motions to compel arbitration are reviewed under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure summary judgment standard”
• holding the existence of an agreement to arbitrate may be decided by the court as a matter of law when “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact” regarding the arbitration agreement
• “[W]e have the authority to review an appeal from the District Court’s order denying a motion to compel arbitration, irrespective of the fact that the order was denied without prejudice.”
• “An arbitration agreement cannot be construed as substantively unconscionable where it does not alter or limit the rights and remedies available to a party in the arbitral forum.” (cleaned up)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).