Skip to main content

Webb v. State

Citations

  • 109 S.W.3d 580
  • 2003 Tex. App. LEXIS 4573
  • 2003 WL 21233563

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[B]ecause pornography produced with real children is not a category of speech protected by the First Amendment, the statute’s prohibition of these materials does not violate the First Amendment.”
  • “[B]ecause pornography produced with real children is not a category of speech protected by the First Amendment, the statute’s prohibition of these materials does not violate the First Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Day, Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.