United States v. George Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Ashcroft invalidated only two definitions of virtual child pornography and left intact a valid definition of traditional child pornography under which the defendant was convicted
• holding that Ashcroft invalidated only two definitions of virtual child pornography and left in tact a valid definition of traditional child pornography under which the defendant was convicted
• commenting that Supreme Court struck down “the provisions of the CPPA that expanded the definition of child pornography to include virtual images”
• upholding a guilty plea “because regulation of real child pornography remains constitutional . . . and Mr. Kelly possessed real child pornography”
• upholding a guilty plea “[b]ecause regulation of real child pornography remains constitutional . . . and Mr. Kelly 41 See, e.g., 3 Leonard B. Sand et al., Modern Federal Jury Instructions -- Criminal, Inst. 62-22 (2005
• interpreting the holding in Ashcroft to only apply to virtual pornography

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).