Skip to main content

Bruton v. State

Citations

  • 921 S.W.2d 531
  • 1996 Tex. App. LEXIS 1778
  • 1996 WL 219681

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that single reference to punishment range “wás not of such a damning character that it would be impossible to remove the harmful impression from the minds of the jurors”
  • noting that “[t]he prosecutor referred to only one range of punishment” and concluding, “Therefore, the jury was not encouraged to choose between the two offenses on the basis of a comparison between punishments, rather than the facts presented.”
  • assuming for sake of argument that statement explaining that crime was second-degree felony and that punishment range was two to twenty years was improper jury argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cayce, Dauphinot, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

26 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Bruton v. State

25 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.