Chatman v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the State’s failure to file a brief does not require “automatic reversal . . . if this Court can say with confidence that the [conviction] should be affirmed”
• affirming the trial court’s judgment of conviction despite the State’s failure to timely file a brief on direct appeal
• affirming trial court’s judgment of conviction despite State’s failure to file an appellee brief altogether
• affirming trial court’s judgment of conviction despite State’s failure to file an appel-lee brief altogether

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).