Skip to main content

Chatman v. State

Citations

  • 846 S.W.2d 329
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 28
  • 1993 WL 19973

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that “acting alone or as a party, as that term has been defined,” generally applied law of parties to facts in application paragraph
  • concluding that the general application of the law of parties to the facts was sufficient to refer the jury to the abstract instructions on the law of parties
  • holding that an application paragraph which incorporated the law of parties by stating only that the “either acting alone or as a party, as that term has been defined” sufficiently applied the law of parties
  • determining that application paragraph incorporated law of parties and applied law of parties to facts of case by stating that defendant “either acting alone or as a party, as that term has been defined”
  • determining legal sufficiency of the evidence using rule from Benson v. State , 661 S.W.2d 708 (Tex. Crim. App. 1982) (opinion on State’s second motion for reh’g), overruled by Malik v. State , 953 S.W.2d 234, 239 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997
  • application paragraph not defective which referred the jury to instructions on vicarious criminal responsibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: White, Clinton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

54 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Chatman v. State

76 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.