Skip to main content

Smith v. State

Citations

  • 703 S.E.2d 629

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no ineffective assistance in the failure to object to the prosecutor’s closing argument because it was “reasonable for [defense counsel] to pursue a strategy that would allow the potentially inappropriate 10 antics of the prosecutor to backfire against her”
  • “In this regard, we must remind all prosecutors in this State that it is not their job to pursue stunts and antics during their closing arguments that are designed merely to appeal to the prejudices of jurors.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Melton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

43 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.