Mahla v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• commenting that the doctrine goes beyond the principles of \inherently” and \factually” included offenses which are well-established by our case law
• commenting that the doctrine goes beyond the principles of \inherently\ and \factually\ included offenses which are well-established by our case law
• finding prosecutor’s closing statement to jury that they should “not allow [defendant] to prey upon others” and “not allow [defendant] to get to Jason or any other children” was “within the ambit of reasonable prosecutorial advocacy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).