John Aaron Shoultz III v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that although appellant failed to set out the instructions or objections in his argument, he had “impeccably cited to the appendix and transcript, thereby permitting this Court to easily evaluate his claim.”
• “failure to make a contemporaneous objection to evidence when it is offered waives any claim of error in its admission on appeal”
• challenge to evidence waived because defendant did not assert objection contemporaneously with the introduction of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).