Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 7/1/2008
Washington v. State
Citations
- 951 A.2d 885
- 180 Md. App. 458
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- argument is not improper if the statements can be construed as comments “fairly deducible from the evidence,” even if “ ‘the inferences discussed are illogical and erroneous’ ”
- “Appellant has not challenged evidentiary sufficiency. Therefore, we recite only the portions of the trial evidence necessary to provide a context for our discussion of the issues presented.”
- recitation of full record unnecessary because no challenge made to sufficiency of evidence
- recitation of full record unnecessary because no challenge made to sufficiency of evidence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Donati v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-01-29· cited 26×
- Teixeira v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-09-05· cited 19×
- Sivells v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-02· cited 15×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-03-30· cited 11×
- Drake v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 11×
- Pickett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-03· cited 9×
- Drake and Charles v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-07-07· cited 8×
- Sharp v. DowneyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-12-17· cited 8×
- Parker v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-05-07· cited 7×
- Elliott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2009-06-01· cited 6×
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-05-27· cited 6×
- Page v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2015-04-30· cited 6×
- Hall, Cummings, Lubin v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2017-06-28· cited 6×
- Montague v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2019-12-23· cited 6×
- Joyner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2012-11-29· cited 3×
- In Re TAVON T.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2014-10-06
- Banks v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2013-08-30
Cites
52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court· 1965-04-05· cited 4,761×
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court· 1985-11-04· cited 1,786×
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,330×
- United States v. AbelSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,044×
- Haig v. AgeeSupreme Court· 1981-06-29· cited 606×
- United States v. NovationEleventh Circuit· 2001-10-30· cited 259×
- Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1974-09-26· cited 259×
- United States v. Barry Jay FeldmanNinth Circuit· 1986-05-23· cited 215×
- United States v. David GarzaFifth Circuit· 1979-12-21· cited 181×
- Degren v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1999-01-14· cited 158×
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1997-07-28· cited 144×
- The Washington Post v. Honorable Deborah RobinsonD.C. Circuit· 1991-06-14· cited 140×
- United States v. Jeffrey Jay RutgardNinth Circuit· 1997-06-04· cited 122×
- Trimble v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
- United States v. Gregory ChristopheNinth Circuit· 1987-12-04· cited 94×
- Dufour v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1985-02-19· cited 93×
- Yopps v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1962-03-23· cited 88×
- Smith v. DanielczykCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2007-07-25· cited 76×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.