Skip to main content

Washington v. State

Citations

  • 951 A.2d 885
  • 180 Md. App. 458

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • argument is not improper if the statements can be construed as comments “fairly deducible from the evidence,” even if “ ‘the inferences discussed are illogical and erroneous’ ”
  • “Appellant has not challenged evidentiary sufficiency. Therefore, we recite only the portions of the trial evidence necessary to provide a context for our discussion of the issues presented.”
  • recitation of full record unnecessary because no challenge made to sufficiency of evidence
  • recitation of full record unnecessary because no challenge made to sufficiency of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.