United States v. Novation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “statements concerning the testimony that would become available by severing trials must be specific and exonerative, rather than conclusory or self-serving, in order to justify severance”
• ruling on Mr. Rodriguez’s motion to sever the trials of the co-conspirators
• explaining the procedure for missing exhibits under Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 10(e)
• tracing the root of a criminal defendant’s right to be present to the Sixth Amendment’s Confrontation Clause, the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause, and Rule 43 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Pro- cedure
• applying pre-2000 version of Rule 701

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).