Ware v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s consent to examine a toothbrush holder extended to the interior as well as the exterior of that container
• holding that the defendant's consent to examine a toothbrush holder extended to the interior as well as the exterior of that container
• stating that “the test for determining the scope of consent is objective reasonableness, not the subjective intent of the consenting party”
• explaining that reasonable suspicion analysis is only necessary if we first conclude that a defendant was seized within the meaning 22 of the Fourth Amendment (citing Hawkins v. United States, 663 A.2d 1221, 1225 (D.C. 1995)
• anonymous tip sufficiently corroborated justified seizure
• anonymous tip sufficiently corroborated justified seizure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• DEVON SHARP v. UNITED STATES
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-02-18· cited 40×
• Joseph v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-28· cited 34×
• Lewis v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2001-02-01· cited 33×
• Anthony Hooks v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-05-30· cited 23×
• Brown v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2009-11-25· cited 18×
• Davis v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-09-21· cited 17×
• Nixon v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2005-03-17· cited 10×
• In re D.T.B.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-11· cited 5×
• State v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1997-10-09· cited 3×
• In re S.B.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-05-31· cited 2×
• In Re DTB
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1999-03-11
• In Re Sb
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-05-31
• Ford v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-02-25
• Henderson v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2022-06-16
• Grant v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2026-02-26

Cites

39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• Illinois v. Gates
  Supreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
• Katz v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Florida v. Royer
  Supreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
• United States v. Mendenhall
  Supreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
• United States v. Cortez
  Supreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
• United States v. Sokolow
  Supreme Court· 1989-04-03· cited 4,647×
• Florida v. Bostick
  Supreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
• California v. Hodari D.
  Supreme Court· 1991-04-23· cited 3,670×
• Alabama v. White
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 3,282×
• Illinois v. Rodriguez
  Supreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Delgado
  Supreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
• Michigan v. Chesternut
  Supreme Court· 1988-06-13· cited 1,499×
• Brown v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-05-08· cited 133×
• Peay v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-10-10· cited 128×
• Gomez v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 72×
• United States v. Barnes
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-16· cited 68×
• United States v. Donato Battista
  D.C. Circuit· 1989-06-02· cited 63×