State v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we conclude that [the police officer] could have reasonably believed that [the] defendant’s general consent to ‘look’ or ‘check’ under the front seat for weapons or drugs extended to the contents of the leather case” found under front seat

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jenkins
  Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2010-09-07· cited 59×
• State v. Soto
  Utah Supreme Court· 2022-02-17

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Schneckloth v. Bustamonte
  Supreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
• Florida v. Jimeno
  Supreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
• State v. Dunn
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 447×
• United States v. McSween
  Fifth Circuit· 1995-05-22· cited 162×
• People v. Thiret
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1984-07-16· cited 121×
• State v. Valdez
  Utah Supreme Court· 1973-08-24· cited 63×
• State v. Carter
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1991-05-28· cited 36×
• R. J. v. S. L. J.
  Supreme Court· 1995-10-02· cited 29×
• Ware v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-27· cited 18×
• State v. Genovesi
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-12-29· cited 16×
• State v. Castner
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1992-01-24· cited 16×
• State v. Andreason
  Utah Supreme Court· 1986-05-06· cited 13×
• United States v. Cucci
  W.D. Virginia· 1995-05-18· cited 10×
• State v. McGrath
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1996-11-29· cited 3×