District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2/18/2016
DEVON SHARP v. UNITED STATES
Citations
- 132 A.3d 161
- 2016 D.C. App. LEXIS 40
- 2016 WL 683820
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that whether a defendant was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment is a question of law, which we review de novo
- holding defendant was seized \in the absence of any sign that a reasonable person in these circumstances would believe the officer was giving him a genuine choice to decline the request\
- explaining that \Kelly is a pure questioning case\
- a reasonable person would not have understood the police officer's request to the driver to \step out of the vehicle\ as \giving him a genuine choice to decline the request and stay in the car\ but instead \conveyed a message that compliance with their request was required\ (brackets omitted)
- individual sitting in a parked car
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackburne-Rigsby, Beckwith, Farrell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. RogersNebraska Supreme Court· 2017-07-21· cited 47×
- Anthony Hooks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-05-30· cited 23×
- Everett Miles v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2018-03-29· cited 17×
- GORDON C. CARPENTER and TYRONE P. JONES v. UNITED STATESDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2016-08-11· cited 3×
- Dozier v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2019-12-05
- Golden v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-04-15
- Maye v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-10-07
- Crews v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10
- Mitchell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2024-05-09
- Ford v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-07-31
- Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2025-08-28
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 7,197×
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court· 1980-06-30· cited 6,313×
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court· 1981-01-21· cited 5,975×
- Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court· 1979-03-27· cited 5,549×
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court· 1991-06-20· cited 4,435×
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court· 1977-12-05· cited 3,269×
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court· 1984-04-17· cited 1,950×
- Brendlin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 2007-06-18· cited 1,523×
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court· 2006-10-05· cited 525×
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1993-10-14· cited 417×
- Gomez v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1991-09-30· cited 72×
- United States v. BarnesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-16· cited 68×
- Miller v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2011-03-03· cited 49×
- Kelly v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1990-09-26· cited 47×
- United States v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1985-08-05· cited 44×
- Umanzor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2002-07-25· cited 44×
- Jones v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-09-18· cited 42×
- In re J.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1992-12-30· cited 42×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.