Walker Digital, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “there is no legal impediment to having an indirect infringement cause of action limited to post-litigation conduct”
• explaining that “defendant’s receipt of the complaint and decision to continue its conduct despite the knowledge gleaned from the complaint satisfies the requirements of Global-Tech ”
• finding that complaint provided sufficient notice of indirect infringement claim limited to post-filing conduct
• upholding claim for willful infringement where the amended complaint provided evidence that the defendant had pre-suit knowledge of the patents-in-suit due to the defendant’s interactions with the plaintiffs representatives
• “there is no requirement to allege pre-suit knowledge of the patent to state a claim for contributory infringement”
• “The court is not prepared to engage in a claim construction exercise at this stage of the proceedings, with no context whatsoever provided by discovery or a motion practice.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Script Security Solutions LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 2016-03-17· cited 46×
• Monec Holding AG v. Motorola Mobility, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2012-09-20· cited 30×
• Dermafocus LLC v. Ulthera, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2016-08-11· cited 23×
• Windy City Innovations, LLC v. Microsoft Corp.
  N.D. California· 2016-06-17· cited 15×
• Rembrandt Social Media, LP v. Facebook, Inc.
  E.D. Virginia· 2013-06-12· cited 15×
• Telecomm Innovations, LLC v. Ricoh Co.
  D. Delaware· 2013-08-06· cited 14×
• Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Ricoh Co.
  D. Delaware· 2014-09-12· cited 8×
• MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Jardogs, LLC
  C.D. California· 2014-02-14· cited 6×
• Regents of the University v. AT & T Mobility LLC
  D. Minnesota· 2015-09-29· cited 5×
• Aeritas, LLC v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2012-09-28· cited 5×
• MobileMedia Ideas, LLC v. Apple Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2012-11-08· cited 5×
• Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Nikon Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2013-04-01· cited 5×
• Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Toshiba Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2014-09-03· cited 4×
• Brandywine Communications Technologies, LLC v. Casio Computer Co.
  M.D. Florida· 2012-12-05· cited 4×
• Bel Fuse Inc. v. Molex Inc.
  D. New Jersey· 2014-06-16· cited 3×
• Stephenson v. Game Show Network, LLC
  D. Delaware· 2013-03-27· cited 3×
• Fairchild Semiconductor Corp. v. Power Integrations, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2013-03-29· cited 3×
• Versata Software, Inc. v. Callidus Software Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2013-05-16· cited 3×
• Courtesy Products, L.L.C. v. Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2014-11-05· cited 2×
• InterMetro Industries Corp. v. Capsa Solutions, LLC
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2014-09-30· cited 1×

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Erickson v. Pardus
  Supreme Court· 2007-06-04· cited 34,635×
• Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB S. A.
  Supreme Court· 2011-05-31· cited 600×
• Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-08· cited 418×
• McZeal v. Sprint Nextel Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 2007-09-14· cited 385×
• Dsu Medical Corporation v. Jms Co., Ltd
  Federal Circuit· 2006-12-13· cited 310×
• DePuy Spine, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2009-06-01· cited 180×
• In Re Seagate Technology, LLC
  Federal Circuit· 2007-08-20· cited 147×
• Liquid Dynamics Corp. v. Vaughan Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2006-06-01· cited 132×
• Spine Solutions, Inc. v. Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2010-09-09· cited 72×
• Anders E. Trell v. Marlee Electronics Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1990-09-28· cited 47×
• Xpoint Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2010-08-12· cited 18×
• Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. FLO TV Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2011-07-12· cited 17×
• LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. v. Whirlpool Corp.
  D. Delaware· 2011-07-01· cited 14×
• Deston Therapeutics LLC v. Trigen Laboratories Inc.
  D. Delaware· 2010-07-12· cited 14×
• Eidos Communications, LLC v. Skype Technologies Sa
  D. Delaware· 2010-02-24· cited 9×