Skip to main content
· 9/28/1990

Anders E. Trell v. Marlee Electronics Corporation

Citations

  • 912 F.2d 1443
  • 1990 WL 125749

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • Federal Circuit expressed preference for established royalty; where none exists, then courts must use hypothetical negotiation analysis
  • “The two methods by which damages are usually calculated under § 284 are assessment of actual damages (the profits the patentee lost due to the infringement) or, if actual damages cannot be ascertained, determination of a reasonable royalty.”
  • “The two methods by which damages are usually calculated under [35 U.S.C.] § 284 are assessment of actual damages (the profits the patentee lost due to the infringement) or, if actual damages cannot be ascertained, determination of a reasonable royalty.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Archer, Alarcon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.