· 9/28/1990
Anders E. Trell v. Marlee Electronics Corporation
Citations
- 912 F.2d 1443
- 1990 WL 125749
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Federal Circuit expressed preference for established royalty; where none exists, then courts must use hypothetical negotiation analysis
- “The two methods by which damages are usually calculated under § 284 are assessment of actual damages (the profits the patentee lost due to the infringement) or, if actual damages cannot be ascertained, determination of a reasonable royalty.”
- “The two methods by which damages are usually calculated under [35 U.S.C.] § 284 are assessment of actual damages (the profits the patentee lost due to the infringement) or, if actual damages cannot be ascertained, determination of a reasonable royalty.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Archer, Alarcon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.